Ace Attorney Online

We featured now, sorry about the delay! ★

I've adressed nearly everything you mentioned. There are a couple of things I'm unsure on, though. I can't find the frame where you said evidence was added to the court record again. Do you still remember where it was? Regarding the usage of dammit that you mentioned in part 2, does that mean all "...

You need to make all the corrections, and then it'll get featured.

SOC: 432: Wouldn’t it make more sense for his nickname to be “Doug,” not “Dug”? (post-play addendum: while I think it probably should have been "Doug," I'm also don't really feel changing it through the entire case is worth it) 4852: I assume this should be “Heya,” not “Hya” 545: This should probab...

Hmmm.... Nope, can't think of any more minor yet annoying things to make you fix. Darn, guess I can't put it off any longer.

★ The QA inspection is complete. This case is now featured. Congratulations!

Redddd I actually, genuinely forgot about this. I have three other half done cases that are taking up my attention, I suppose. Well, here we are... Our protagonist has indomitable bad luck, which this time takes the form of... finding a bloody knife in the local library and promptly getting arreste...

Well, here we are... Our protagonist has indomitable bad luck, which this time takes the form of... finding a bloody knife in the local library and promptly getting arrested for murder. This seems like it should be a straightforward case (especially since we don't even know of a victim), and in man...

Welp... sorry again. There were still a lot of minor typos, so... figured it'd be easier to just deal with them myself. 64: I’ve --> I 707: delete the comma 708: nearby --> near 548: at a --> up the 590: Known --> Know 742: be --> have been 726: questioning its own 847: left --> leave (change in cro...

"TAKE THAT!"s should go whenever you present evidence, wrong or right. If you really think they feel weird in the theory development sections, maybe you can just put them for the last present to act like a capstone of sorts?

Check 1 is... passed. While the story could probably use a bit more development of the story, but we have a prosecutor/attorney, a seemingly impossible crime, a second murder that's connected to the first, and it all ties thematically to the Dark Age of the Law, and it all comes together well enoug...

Like has been mentioned, the waitress was hired to spill water on Helene to get her to take off her gloves, and then to give Henry and Oberon the silverware afterwards; they wanted to be sure the lighter actually did have Titania's fingerprints before going through with the plan. Oberon changed his...

DJJ6800 wrote:

Spoiler : :

Ok I’ve been looking at the lobster dialogue in this chat and realized something. The waitress was the one who spilled the water on “Helene.” Did Oberon and Henry pay her to do that or something?

yup