AceAttorneyMaster111 wrote:It's been over a year now. Will anything ever come of the re-QA or is it being abandoned?
The idea hasn't been abandoned, no, though it has gone dormant.
As for updates... can't give you that just yet.
[D]isordered speech is not so much injury to the lips that give it forth, as to the disproportion and incoherence of things in themselves, so negligently expressed. ~ Ben Jonson
To help speed this along, I volunteer myself to play certain questionable cases and see if they require a full QA test. Even though I do not have the honor of blueness, could I still do this?
Meaning to ask this for a while, so may as well...
With a featured section reorganization, is there a possibility that some of the rules about featuring will be changed? Most notably, the "no comedy or miscs" rule. Iirc, that's been long since abandoned in the French section, so...
Spyromed wrote:Meaning to ask this for a while, so may as well...
With a featured section reorganization, is there a possibility that some of the rules about featuring will be changed? Most notably, the "no comedy or miscs" rule. Iirc, that's been long since abandoned in the French section, so...
YES PLEASE KILL THAT RULE
MAKE IT DIE WITH FIRE
Avatar made by Rimuu~
"The Knight of the Iron Hammer, Vita, and the Steel Count, Graf Eisen. There's nothing in this world we can't destroy."
Unas in page 1 of this topic wrote:
And at last, I'm perfectly fine with non-AA content in the featured trials. It's been the case for ages in the French section, where the reviewers feature pretty much anything they want, provided they agree it's good enough. ...[more stuff here]... Sure, it might be good to change that criteria and widen the scope of QA reviews, I guess it should be discussed with Tap and the team.
@ AceAttorneyMaster, kwando: I don't want anybody touching this who hasn't already been tested and approved by Unas and the rest of the QA team. Whether we'll need external help or not, and the requirements external help if we accept it, have not been discussed.
@ Spyromed: That isn't something we've discussed, but I'd be in favor of changing that rule as well.
[D]isordered speech is not so much injury to the lips that give it forth, as to the disproportion and incoherence of things in themselves, so negligently expressed. ~ Ben Jonson
Spyromed wrote:Most notably, the "no comedy or miscs" rule. Iirc, that's been long since abandoned in the French section, so...
Long since abandoned ? I don't think so.
...
It just never existed.
If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them. Si le savoir peut créer des problèmes, ce n'est pas l'ignorance qui les résoudra. ( Isaac Asimov )
Spyromed wrote:Meaning to ask this for a while, so may as well...
With a featured section reorganization, is there a possibility that some of the rules about featuring will be changed? Most notably, the "no comedy or miscs" rule. Iirc, that's been long since abandoned in the French section, so...
Unas in page 1 of this topic wrote:
And at last, I'm perfectly fine with non-AA content in the featured trials. It's been the case for ages in the French section, where the reviewers feature pretty much anything they want, provided they agree it's good enough. ...[more stuff here]... Sure, it might be good to change that criteria and widen the scope of QA reviews, I guess it should be discussed with Tap and the team.
I'd still be interested. I'll do some digging and will hopefully have something more concrete for you within a day.
[D]isordered speech is not so much injury to the lips that give it forth, as to the disproportion and incoherence of things in themselves, so negligently expressed. ~ Ben Jonson