I know a few people on the forums complain about unfair contradictions, me being one of them. This is obviously a very touchy topic, since some people consider using a walkthrough as something that ruins an experience, but some contradictions are near impossible without one. I played one trial that requires knowledge about Edgar Allen Poe for one contradiction, which is just silly. (Looking at you and your super objection, DWaM.
) Obviously, people who don't like using walkthroughs can just avoid the page entirely. And to discourage people who post incorrect information, there could be a voting system of some sort? And if it gets enough dislikes/downvotes, it could be taken down, and the person who posted it could receive a penalty? Just to keep trolls at bay.
(Note: to avoid misleading thumbnails, I suggest this be an all-text walkthrough system.)
