Tsk, tsk, tsk... I think we are forgetting our footing here. And by "we". I mean "you". Oh, and I fixed your spelling.Psycholocksmith wrote:Objection!
Number one, Edgeworth is too awesome for you.
Secondly, my evidence still stands. I would like to present another possibility to the court: Oogie Boogie Man could just be a formality.
Ah? I suppose you've never had a surname, or a nickname, or called by your initials? Your evidence is not only faulty, but laughable. If we are to take your word at this, where is cooperating evidence (I know I spelled cooperating wrong, but that's spell check for you)? As you know with any case, it is needed to back up any assertion. My evidence is numerous and reliable. First, the credits. The credits show the full name of the character. Secondly, Kingdom Hearts was very accurate in its depiction of all Disney characters.
Ergo, your evidence is faulty, like your reasoning.